Bulios Academy The Bulios Fair Price methodology: how we calculate the fair value of stocks

How to Read Bulios

The Bulios Fair Price methodology: how we calculate the fair value of stocks

Bulios Fair Price estimates the fair value of more than 37,000 stocks using five established valuation methods. This article opens up the entire methodology: what each method measures, when it makes sense and why the result is an estimate, not a price target.

What you will take away

  • Fair value is an estimate of what a stock is actually worth based on the company's fundamentals, independent of the market's current mood.
  • The model works with five established methods: DDM, EPV, the Graham number, the Peter Lynch fair value and relative valuation.
  • Not every method makes sense for every company - the model calculates the ones that fit its profile and combines them into the resulting fair price.
  • Calculations are updated daily and extreme values are reviewed by the analyst team.
  • Every model rests on assumptions about the future - that is why Fair Price is an input for your own analysis, not an investment recommendation.

A stock's price tells you what the market is asking for it right now. Fair value asks a different question: what is the stock actually worth once you set the market's mood aside for a moment and only the fundamentals remain - earnings, dividends, assets and the company's growth. The difference between these two numbers is one of the most useful pieces of information an investor can have. Bulios calculates it for more than 37,000 stocks from all over the world and shows the result as the Bulios Fair Price.

Five methods, five angles

There is no single correct way to value a company. Every established method looks at value from a different angle, and each has situations where it works brilliantly as well as situations where it fails. That is why Bulios does not work with one method, but with five.

  • DDM (dividend discount model). A stock's value is the present value of all the dividends the company will pay out in the future. The method makes sense for stable dividend payers - for a company that pays no dividend or is only starting one, the model leaves it out.
  • EPV (Earnings Power Value). A conservative view: what the company earns today, sustainably and with no assumption of further growth. It answers the question of what the stock would be worth if the company never grew again. It fits mature companies with stable earnings best.
  • Graham number. A value investing classic from Benjamin Graham: it combines earnings per share and book value into one conservative estimate. A quick test of whether the stock's price sits too far from the company's tangible foundations. It cannot be calculated for loss-making companies.
  • Peter Lynch fair value. Peter Lynch's approach ties valuation to the pace of earnings growth: a faster-growing company deserves a higher multiple. That is exactly why it is the most useful method for profitable growth companies that conservative methods treat unfairly.
  • Relative valuation. The only method that looks outward instead of inward: it compares the company's valuation multiples (such as P/E or operating profit multiples) with similar companies in the industry. It tells you what the market is currently paying for a comparable business.

How five methods become one fair price

The key step in the methodology is selection. Not every method makes sense for every company: DDM has nothing to measure at a company with no dividend, the Graham number at a loss-making company, the Lynch fair value at a company with no growth. For each stock, the model therefore evaluates which methods fit its profile, calculates them and combines the usable results into the resulting fair price. You can view the values of the individual methods for every stock in the Fair Price Index - where a method is missing, it cannot be meaningfully calculated for that company.

The calculations are updated every day with fresh market and fundamental data. On top of the automated system, the Bulios analyst team keeps watch: when an extreme value appears for a stock, it goes through an individual review and, if needed, a correction.

The verdict: undervalued, fairly valued, overvalued

Comparing the fair value with the current market price produces the verdict you see on every stock's page: undervalued (the market is paying less than the fundamentals suggest), fairly valued (the price sits close to the estimate) or overvalued (the market is paying a premium over the fundamentals). The upside or downside percentage then tells you how far from the fair value the price currently is.

Where the model gets it wrong

Every valuation model calculates the future from data about the past - and the future has a way of differing from the past. Treat Fair Price with extra caution in these situations:

  • Turning points. A new product, a change of leadership, a regulatory intervention or an acquisition changes the business faster than the financial statements can capture it.
  • One-off items. A one-time gain or write-off temporarily distorts the inputs the methods work with.
  • Growth stories without earnings. A company whose value rests on a distant future is systematically undervalued by conservative methods.
  • Prolonged market deviations. The market can drift away from fundamentals for months or even years. An undervalued stock can keep getting cheaper and an overvalued one keep getting more expensive - fair value says nothing about timing.

That is why the sentence you will see next to Fair Price across the whole site holds: it is an estimate from a valuation model and an input for your own analysis, not an investment recommendation. How to bring the verdict into your own decision-making is covered in the article How to read the Bulios Fair Price.

We use essential cookies to run the website and optional analytics cookies to measure usage. See our Privacy Policy.