Feed Community
JB
Jan Blecha
@janblecha · Aug 27

Over the past year, a lot of people have experienced the same thing. A position they bought as a small addition to their portfolio has grown so much that it now decides their entire result. It's a nice problem to have, but I think it's harder to solve than the opposite one. With a losing position, I can at least tell myself the thesis and either it holds or it doesn't. With a winner that tripled in a year, I'm not wondering whether the company is good. I'm wondering whether I want a single stock to decide my year. I've dealt with this three times in the last six months, and each time I decided differently.

I sold my memory companies entirely. The profit came in a very short time, and mainly I didn't like how those stocks behave. Micron $MU is up from 114 to 938 dollars over the last twelve months, but at the same time it's about 25% below its annual high. SanDisk $SNDK is down by more than a third from its high. This year, both names have had several days with drops of six to ten percent, and Micron's beta is 2.2, meaning double the swings against the market.

What's strange is that based on valuation, it doesn't look overheated. Micron trades at a forward P/E of around 6.5, SanDisk around 7. But with a cyclical company, a low multiple at the peak of the earnings cycle is more of a warning than a discount. It all comes down to a single question: how long will the cycle last? Based on the capex the companies are projecting, it will last a while longer. The five largest American cloud and AI infrastructure providers plan to invest 660 to 690 billion dollars this year, roughly double last year, and Amazon alone is planning 200 billion. I probably sold before the cycle ends, and I consider it the price of peace of mind.

I kept ASML $ASML and only took some profit off the table. The position had grown too large for me, and I didn't want one company to decide my portfolio. But getting rid of it entirely didn't make sense to me, because ASML doesn't rely solely on machine sales. Service and upgrades of already installed machines brought in 2.76 billion euros out of total 9.3 billion in the second quarter, almost a third of revenue, and this money keeps coming even in years when customers don't order new machines.

With the big tech four, meaning $AMZN , $GOOG, $META and $MSFT , on the other hand, I've only been lightly adding the whole time and haven't sold anything.

What about you? Have you already taken some profits from AI positions, or are you letting them ride?

A community member's personal view, not investment advice. Community Guidelines

KJ

I'm still keeping AI in my portfolio. The stocks are more expensive, but not all of them. Some of the ones I have I wouldn't buy now.

JB

Which specific companies do you mean?

MS

I remain in my positions and have no reason to sell. Of course, technology has taken a larger share of the portfolio, but I don't see that as bad when I see a clear direction behind it.

JB

It's about your approach, and if you're happy with your positions, there's no reason to sell.

VN

So do I understand correctly that you sold the hardware maker and bought hyperscalers that will keep buying from them at record prices for the next 2-3 years? It makes no sense to me at all that the semiconductor makers' stock would go sideways/decline the whole time, while hyperscalers would go sideways/rise, even as money is being poured into those companies left and right. Can someone explain this to me?

JB

I'll gladly explain. I bought hyperscalers at much lower prices than they are now (GOOGL at $170, for instance) and occasionally added a bit during dips. Nowhere do I claim memory companies won't grow; on the contrary, I write that when we look at capex and especially long-term contracts, it doesn't look like the cycle is over, but I simply had an already huge position in that, so I sold it with a good profit and kept a position in ASML.

MI

For now I'm keeping everything, since my portfolio is made up of multiple sectors and even after the rally in memory names my positions are balancing out. I also added some $AMZN and $MSFT, I'm not touching $ASML or $MU yet, for me the AI story is still just getting started and the sellout of future capacity speaks for itself.

JB

Great approach.

JI

I took some profit from $APH. I had already decided to get rid of some $MSFT, but they had good earnings, so I left it. I bought more $GOOGL.

JB

I was also considering $TSM, but ultimately didn't include it. Why did you want to get rid of part of $MSFT?

WK

MICRON will have a P/E of 16.6 in March 2027 at a share price of $2000 💥 Cycle peak no earlier than end of 2027! Additionally, it's Trump's horse (they sponsored the White House renovation for $250M). Of course, Trumpy has MICRON in his portfolio (current position worth $1.67M). A correction just isn't for the faint-hearted, and with my average buy-in below $100 I am completely calm 😁 P.S.: Production of HBM4E memory for Vera Rubin from Nvidia has only just fully started, and MAG7 will pay whatever it costs, see CAPEX 😉

JB

If volatility doesn't bother you and your investment thesis is playing out, then why not.

We use essential cookies to run the website and optional analytics cookies to measure usage. See our Privacy Policy.