Feed Community

Vistra $VST has shed almost 10% over the past month, and I want to add context, because I hold the stock with an average price of $144 and my thesis hasn't changed.

I built the position on a simple idea: electricity demand from AI data centers is growing faster than new generation capacity is being added. Vistra has a mix of nuclear, gas, and batteries that lets it deliver power instantly, and that's a fairly scarce commodity in this cycle.

The current drop is a reaction to Q2 results. Revenue slightly below analyst estimates. Operationally, however, the company accelerated, EBITDA rose 31% year over year, and the 2026 outlook remained unchanged. So in my view, it's short-term disappointment in one metric, not a challenge to the business model.

That's why I continue to hold the position and plan to add in the $128-133 range. I see no reason to change my thesis as long as the fundamentals don't change.

Have you also bet on any energy company?

A community member's personal view, not investment advice. Community Guidelines

DB

I myself added $VST to my portfolio around May at a value of $138, with a clear intention of energy exposure in connection with the huge investments into data centers.

In principle, I completely agree with the post. Vistra is the largest unregulated electricity producer in the US; whether Vistra or Constellation Energy can make sense for an investor who believes in continued investment into AI infrastructure and growth in energy demand.

Perhaps the only thing that slightly bothers me about the fundamentals is the high Debt to Equity ratio at roughly 3.6 (compared to $CEG around 0.7). On the other hand, this is partly due to the aggressive buyback program (over $6.5 billion USD since 2021, reducing share count by 30%) and ongoing acquisitions (Lotus, pending Cogentrix), not just a one-off event.

Still, S&P Global and Fitch raised Vistra's rating to investment grade (BBB-), also thanks to the predictability of cash flow from new PPAs with Meta and AWS. So while it is significantly more leveraged compared to CEG and likely may be more sensitive to a potential rise in interest rates, I don't see this as a fundamental risk and in case of a drop below $134 I will buy more.

VS

Thanks for the great addition! I agree. The debt is indeed higher at first glance, but a substantial part of it is fixed at low rates from past years, so the immediate sensitivity to rates is not as dramatic as the Debt/Equity ratio alone suggests. Long-term PPA contracts with hyperscalers also give Vistra certainty of stable cash flow, while its nuclear capacity gives it a strong negotiating position for premium prices for 24/7 clean energy. Aggressive buybacks combined with this stability effectively drive EPS growth, so adding below $134 makes good sense.

We use essential cookies to run the website and optional analytics cookies to measure usage. See our Privacy Policy.