Feed Articles

240 billion dollars a year: the US stalemate could jeopardise a major tax deal

JC
Jamie Cameron
· · 3 min read

A political stalemate in Washington could destroy a landmark tax deal that has been carefully negotiated between 140 countries for more than a decade.

Some analysts warn that the failure of the United States to ratify the deal could lead to a tax war among the world's richest nations, hitting tech giants like Google $GOOG, Microsoft $MSFT, Apple $AAPL, Meta $META and Amazon $AMZNhard .

What's going on?

The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) has been working for years on an agreement among its member countries that would close loopholes allowing large multinational corporations to avoid paying taxes of up to $240 billion a year.

In 2021, the OECD came up with an agreement that was signed by all parties involved. This reform, called 'Pillar 1', would simply require companies to pay taxes in the country where they made their money, regardless of whether they are based there.

It took more than a decade of work by the OECD and other parties to reach this agreement.

Where is the problem?

Pillar 1 reform was due to be ratified by 30 June. However, this has not happened.

Although the Biden administration generally supports the plan, Senate Republicans oppose it, and a divided Senate has blocked the United States from ratifying the agreement. (Under the U.S. Constitution, tax treaties require the advice and consent of the Senate with a two-thirds majority vote, according to the Senate Finance Committee website.)

Former President Donald Trump, meanwhile, has indicated that he would not support these reforms if re-elected to office.

Other countries, however, are not waiting for the outcome. Canada recently imposed a local tax on the world's largest tech companies, something the OECD has sought to avoid. New Zealand has also announced it will introduce its own digital services tax on large multinationals from 2025.

Manal Corwin, director of the OECD's Centre for Tax Policy and Administration, says negotiations are still ongoing.

"Countries are still negotiating, precisely because we are making progress," she said in a statement on Monday. "As we reach each of these milestones, whether or not we successfully conclude the negotiations by the deadline, we are getting closer to our goal." she added.

What does that mean?

If no global agreement goes into effect, some countries will start competing for revenue from large multinationals by cutting taxes in a so-called "tax war."

It also means that big tech companies will face inconsistent tax rules around the world as national taxes proliferate (see Canada and New Zealand).

"When companies feel secure and can predict where policy is going and what the global financial outlook will be for the foreseeable future, they are much more confident in investing," said Megan Funkhouser of the Information Technology Council, a group representing the technology sector.

If taxation and global policy toward digital companies is "uncertain, unpredictable and unstable," she said, companies may not want to "invest, contribute to economic growth and create and sustain jobs."

Disclaimer: You will find a lot of inspiration on Bulios, but stock selection and portfolio construction is up to you, so always do a thorough analysis of your own.

Stocks mentioned

AM

AMZN

MS

MSFT

GO

GOOG

ME

META

AA

AAPL

A community member's personal view, not investment advice. Community Guidelines

Follow Bulios on Google News

Be among the first to discover new analyses, news and market moves.

Follow

Recommended articles

Read more

The World’s Cheapest Markets? 4 ETFs for Asia

While investors today pay roughly 19 times expected earnings for U.S. stocks, there are exchanges in Asia where the same earnings cost less than half as much. But a low multiple alone does not mean a good deal. Some discounts reflect the peak of the semiconductor cycle, while others stem from the…

KJ
Kryštof Jáně
· 3h
Read more
BLACK

SoFi Stock Is 46% Below Its High. Is It Cheap, or Does It Just Look Cheap?

Revenue is up 44%, profit 73%, and management has promised a figure for 2027 for the first time. Yet the stock is nearly half its annual high and down from n

MC
Milan Charvat
· 6h
Read more
BLACK

A Slightly Spoiled Soup. Why Did the Famous Company Have to Cut Its Dividend After a 67% Plunge?

Campbell's stock is near its lows after a year of declines, and screeners show a 6.8% yield. But in September, management cut the dividend for the first time since 2001, even though it had the cash to pay it. What will be left of that figure for someone buying today?

MC
Milan Charvat
· 10h

We use essential cookies to run the website and optional analytics cookies to measure usage.

Privacy policy